Verifying a PCB layout before sending it out to proto fab is a lot like flossing your teeth – everyone knows they should do it, but a lot of people don’t. Why should you fully verify your design after routing, even though it’s difficult?
Large, complex designs have strict requirements across multiple domains – signal and power integrity, EMC, and so on. Even when detailed routing guidelines exist, it’s often impossible to follow them exactly, and the rules get bent or broken. And then, there are just – mistakes. In complex designs, mistakes will inevitably be made, and randomly. It’s safe to say that problems will exist; it’s just a matter of whether you find them before it’s too late.
It doesn’t help that fully reviewing layouts is hard, needing expert review across multiple domains. Most reviews are based on visual inspections, and both eyes and people get tired. Manual inspection is a long, tedious process and it’s not guaranteed to find all the problems that exist.
The Progressive Verification methodology, by contrast, has the specific goal of finding problems as quickly and as easily as possible. It’s based on the observation that the time and expertise needed to perform analysis goes up non-linearly as accuracy increases. There are a lot of design problems that don’t require IBIS-AMI models and full-wave EM simulation to find. With Progressive Verification, we analyze the design in successive stages with increasing analytical detail. The bulk of the issues are found and resolved before the SI experts are brought in, so that limited SI expertise is used as cost-effectively as possible.
What You Will Learn:
Who Should Attend:
Products Covered:
Technical Marketing Engineer
Bradley graduated from Oregon State University in 2018 with a bachelor's degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering. Immediately after college, he began working at Siemens as a Corporate Marketing Engineer. Currently, he is a Technical Marketing Engineer for the HyperLynx product focused on serial link channel verification and automation.